M/S. BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEAD SOUMYA BANERJEE vs JHARKHAND MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISE FACILITATION COUNCIL THRO ITS SECRETARY-CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY Advocate - SHRESTH GAUTAM, ,PRASHANT JHA,HIMANSHU HARSH,RAHUL ANAND,OMPRAKASH — WPC/4197/2026
Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010143722026
Filing Number
WPC/5103/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/4197/2026
Registration Date
17-Jun-2026
Judge
Not Available
Coram
Not Available
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Quashing Matter ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. BHARAT ALUMINIUM COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS LEGAL HEAD SOUMYA BANERJEE
Adv. KAUSHIK SARKHEL,INDRAJIT SINHA,INDRAJIT SINHA, ,INDRAJIT SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.JHARKHAND MICRO AND SMALL ENTERPRISE FACILITATION COUNCIL THRO ITS SECRETARY-CUM-MEMBER SECRETARY Advocate - SHRESTH GAUTAM, ,PRASHANT JHA,HIMANSHU HARSH,RAHUL ANAND,OMPRAKASH
-
2.M/S. VASSU ENTERPRISE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR. GANESH AGIWAL
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
19-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
19-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 4197 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court allowed I.A. No. 6608 of 2026, overlooking the petitioner's delay in obtaining certified copies. The court accepted the respondents' counsel's vakalatnama despite the absence of formal notice, ruling that the Registry cannot prevent a party aware of proceedings from appearing. The case was adjourned to 24.06.2026 for fresh filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Orders(with defect)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
17-Jun-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
17-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/4197/2026
Case Summary: In WP(C) No. 4197 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court allowed I.A. No. 6608 of 2026, overlooking the petitioner's delay in obtaining certified copies. The court accepted the respondents' counsel's vakalatnama despite the absence of formal notice, ruling that the Registry cannot prevent a party aware of proceedings from appearing. The case was adjourned to 24.06.2026 for fresh filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts