DULAR GOPE And ORS. vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - APP, ,KUMARI RASHMI — Cr.A(DB)/104/2003

Next hearing: 11th August 2026.

Next hearing 11-Aug-2026

CNR: JHHC010143412003

Filing Number

Cr.A(DB)/11320/2003

Filing Date

17-Jan-2003

Registration No

Cr.A(DB)/104/2003

Registration Date

17-Jan-2003

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Section 374(2) & 389(1) 389(2) ( 16 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DULAR GOPE And ORS.

    Adv. T.R.BAJAJ,PRABHASH CH. SINHA,PRABHASH CH. SINHA, ,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH,RANDHIR SINGH,PRABHASH CH. SINHA

  2. 2.Churaman Gope

  3. 3.Gowardhan Gope

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor), ,KUMARI RASHMI

Case History

  1. 11-Aug-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Aug-2026

    Hearing (On Bail)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay,hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar SrivastavaView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.A(DB) No. 104/2003 - Dular Gope & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand The case was adjourned to 11.08.2026. The court directed the office to prepare typed depositions and serve copies to counsel for both parties. The appellants' counsel was permitted to file requisites and obtain the paper book from the court office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 17-Jan-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.A(DB)/104/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.A(DB) No. 104/2003 - Dular Gope & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand The case was adjourned to 11.08.2026. The court directed the office to prepare typed depositions and serve copies to counsel for both parties. The appellants' counsel was permitted to file requisites and obtain the paper book from the court office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case