UDAY GOND vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO — B.A./3799/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),352,3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010142732026

Filing Number

B.A./9205/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3799/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 109(1),351(3),352,3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UDAY GOND

    Adv. DEEPAK SAHU,PRATIUSH LALA,PRATIUSH LALA, ,PRATIUSH LALA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PRAFUL JOJO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Uday Gond, accused of attempted murder and criminal intimidation in Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025. The petitioner was implicated based solely on co-accused confessions despite not being named in the FIR, no injuries were sustained, and he had been in custody since February 28, 2026. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on his cooperation with trial proceedings and undertaking not to intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3799/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Uday Gond, accused of attempted murder and criminal intimidation in Sahibganj Nagar P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025. The petitioner was implicated based solely on co-accused confessions despite not being named in the FIR, no injuries were sustained, and he had been in custody since February 28, 2026. The court directed his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditioned on his cooperation with trial proceedings and undertaking not to intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case