DEEPAK KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR — LPA/309/2026
Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010142482026
Filing Number
LPA/5057/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
LPA/309/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Clause 10 Of Letters Patent ( 24 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Disposed of as Withdrawn
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK KUMAR
Adv. SURAJ SINGH,SUNIL SINGH,SUNIL SINGH, ,SUNIL SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR
-
2.PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT
-
3.DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION
-
4.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PAKUR
-
5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, PAKUR
-
6.DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER-CUM-DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER, PAKUR
-
7.BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER, AMRAPARA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of Deepak Kumar's appeal (LPA 309/2026) against the State of Jharkhand and education department officials as withdrawn, following the appellant's counsel's request and with no opposition from respondents. The ancillary interlocutory applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Orders (Withdrawal of Cases)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. LPA/309/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of Deepak Kumar's appeal (LPA 309/2026) against the State of Jharkhand and education department officials as withdrawn, following the appellant's counsel's request and with no opposition from respondents. The ancillary interlocutory applications were also disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts