WASIM AKRAM vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA — Cr.M.P./1383/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 84,BNSS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010142302026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./9176/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1383/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Quashing Matter ( 206 )

Sub-Category

Quashing of Order ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 84,BNSS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WASIM AKRAM

    Adv. AKHOURI AWINASH KUMAR,ASHWINI PRIYA,ASHWINI PRIYA, ,ASHWINI PRIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1383/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petition and quashed the proclamation order dated 18.04.2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rajmahal. Key Reasoning: The court held that when issuing a proclamation under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, the magistrate must specify the time and place for the accused's appearance in the order itself. Since the learned magistrate failed to mention these details, the proclamation order was not sustainable in law and was accordingly quashed, with directions to pass a fresh order in compliance with legal requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1383/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1383/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petition and quashed the proclamation order dated 18.04.2026 issued by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Rajmahal. Key Reasoning: The court held that when issuing a proclamation under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, the magistrate must specify the time and place for the accused's appearance in the order itself. Since the learned magistrate failed to mention these details, the proclamation order was not sustainable in law and was accordingly quashed, with directions to pass a fresh order in compliance with legal requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case