CHHOTAN KUMAR MEHTA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY — B.A./3920/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010142222026
Filing Number
B.A./9168/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3920/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHHOTAN KUMAR MEHTA
Adv. SANJAY KR PANDEY 2
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Chhotan Kumar Mehta, accused of motorcycle theft under BNS section 303(2). The court found that he had been in custody since March 9, 2026, had no criminal antecedents, and was implicated primarily on a confessional statement. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioning that he cooperate with trial proceedings, provide mobile number and Aadhar copy, and not harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3920/2026
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Chhotan Kumar Mehta, accused of motorcycle theft under BNS section 303(2). The court found that he had been in custody since March 9, 2026, had no criminal antecedents, and was implicated primarily on a confessional statement. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, conditioning that he cooperate with trial proceedings, provide mobile number and Aadhar copy, and not harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts