BISHAL GUPTA ALIAS VISHAL GUPTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN — B.A./3945/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(6),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010142202026

Filing Number

B.A./9166/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3945/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(6),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BISHAL GUPTA ALIAS VISHAL GUPTA

    Adv. ASHOK KUMAR,RUPESH KUMAR,RUPESH KUMAR, ,RUPESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHINTO SEN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. 3945/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Bishal Gupta, accused in a robbery case under Section 309(6) BNS, on his second bail application. The court considered that examination of three trial witnesses revealed no specific role attributed to the petitioner, with witnesses failing to implicate him. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial proceedings and undertaking not to contact or disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3945/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. 3945/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Bishal Gupta, accused in a robbery case under Section 309(6) BNS, on his second bail application. The court considered that examination of three trial witnesses revealed no specific role attributed to the petitioner, with witnesses failing to implicate him. The court ordered his release on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial proceedings and undertaking not to contact or disturb witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case