SONA MAHTO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK — B.A./3959/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 274,275,292,3(5),BNS,47(a),EXCISE,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010141382026
Filing Number
B.A./9119/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3959/2026
Registration Date
06-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CUSTOM & EXCISE ( 122 )
Sub-Category
Excise (malt Liquors) Act,1890 ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONA MAHTO
Adv. PANKAJ VERMA,TRISHNA SAGAR,TRISHNA SAGAR, ,HARSHIT JAIN,VIKESH KUMAR,MANJULIKA HORO,TRISHNA SAGAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. /3959/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sona Mahto, accused of illegal possession of 792 litres of wine under BNS 2023 sections and the Excise Act, citing his clean criminal record and prolonged custody since February 2026. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar copy, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3959/2026
Case Summary: B.A. /3959/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sona Mahto, accused of illegal possession of 792 litres of wine under BNS 2023 sections and the Excise Act, citing his clean criminal record and prolonged custody since February 2026. The court ordered his release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including trial cooperation, provision of mobile number and Aadhar copy, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts