MEGHNATH GHOSH vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI — B.A./3859/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 87,65(1),BNS,4(2),POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010141212026
Filing Number
B.A./9104/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3859/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEGHNATH GHOSH
Adv. SWAMI NATH PRASAD RAI
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BISHAMBHAR SHASTRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. No. 3859 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Meghnath Ghosh's bail application in a POCSO case where he has been in custody since January 2025, charged under BNS Sections 87, 65(1) and POCSO Act Section 4(2). Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found direct allegations against the petitioner and a prior rejection of his bail application sufficient grounds to deny bail. However, the court directed the State to promptly produce witnesses and ordered compliance communication to prosecution and police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3859/2026
Case Summary: B.A. No. 3859 of 2026 The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Meghnath Ghosh's bail application in a POCSO case where he has been in custody since January 2025, charged under BNS Sections 87, 65(1) and POCSO Act Section 4(2). Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found direct allegations against the petitioner and a prior rejection of his bail application sufficient grounds to deny bail. However, the court directed the State to promptly produce witnesses and ordered compliance communication to prosecution and police authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts