ASHISH YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — B.A./3788/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 112(2),(b),111(3),111(4),319(2),318(4),338,336(3),340,(2),61(2),BNS,66B,66C,66D,84(C),IT,ACT. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010141002026
Filing Number
B.A./9091/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3788/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Information Technology Act, 2000 ( 208 )
Sub-Category
Cyber Crime ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH YADAV
Adv. ARVIND KUMAR CHOUDHARY,RITU RAJ,RITU RAJ, ,PRATIK SINGH,VINITA PRAKASH,RITU RAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
Case History
-
09-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3788/2026 In bail application B.A. 3788/2026, Ashish Yadav's petition was adjourned. The court tagged three related bail applications (arising from the same FIR) together and directed the State to file a counter affidavit with the petitioner's criminal antecedent report and updated case diary. The cases were posted for 09.06.2026, with no bail decision made at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3788/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3788/2026 In bail application B.A. 3788/2026, Ashish Yadav's petition was adjourned. The court tagged three related bail applications (arising from the same FIR) together and directed the State to file a counter affidavit with the petitioner's criminal antecedent report and updated case diary. The cases were posted for 09.06.2026, with no bail decision made at this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts