VIVEK KUMAR MANNA ALIAS VICKY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN — B.A./3790/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 118(2),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010140162026
Filing Number
B.A./9035/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3790/2026
Registration Date
02-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIVEK KUMAR MANNA ALIAS VICKY
Adv. NEELAM KUMARI,RAMESH KUMAR,RAMESH KUMAR, ,RAHUL GOPE,RAMESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AZEEMUDDIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Vivek Kumar Manna (aged 24) in a murder case (Chandil P.S. Case No. 199 of 2025) involving the death of Bijay Tirkey. The court found that the petitioner was implicated primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the FIR and having no criminal antecedents, and noted that a similarly-accused co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of mobile number and Aadhar Card details, and an undertaking not to contact witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3790/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Vivek Kumar Manna (aged 24) in a murder case (Chandil P.S. Case No. 199 of 2025) involving the death of Bijay Tirkey. The court found that the petitioner was implicated primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement despite not being named in the FIR and having no criminal antecedents, and noted that a similarly-accused co-accused had already been granted bail. The petitioner was directed to furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, with conditions requiring cooperation with trial, provision of mobile number and Aadhar Card details, and an undertaking not to contact witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts