PAWAN KUMAR SONI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN — B.A./3925/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 303(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010139822026
Filing Number
B.A./9020/2026
Filing Date
24-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3925/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PAWAN KUMAR SONI
Adv. ASHIM KR SAHANI,VIKESH KUMAR,VIKESH KUMAR, ,VIKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Pawan Kumar Soni, accused of motorcycle theft under Section 303(2) BNS 2023. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary approved release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, considering Soni's custody since March 9, 2026, lack of criminal antecedent, and prior acquittals in two cases. Conditions include cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhaar card, maintaining contact availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
24-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3925/2026
Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Pawan Kumar Soni, accused of motorcycle theft under Section 303(2) BNS 2023. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary approved release on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, considering Soni's custody since March 9, 2026, lack of criminal antecedent, and prior acquittals in two cases. Conditions include cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhaar card, maintaining contact availability, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts