ROSHAN SONKAR ALIAS RAUSHAN SONKAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH — Cr.M.P./1356/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 64(1),34(2)(m),115(2),352,324(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010138902026
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./8959/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1356/2026
Registration Date
02-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROSHAN SONKAR ALIAS RAUSHAN SONKAR
Adv. ROHIT SINHA, ,VIJAY SHANKAR,PARITOSH RAI,ANADI BRAHMA,MD IMRAN HASSAN,NEHA PRIYA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Fresh Filing (Admission)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Fresh Filing (Admission) |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1356/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Roshan Sonkar's criminal miscellaneous petition as frivolous and without merit. Sonkar, accused of offences under BNS 2023 sections including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt, failed to challenge the charge sheet, cognizance order, or file a discharge petition at appropriate stages; instead, he approached the High Court after trial commenced claiming innocence. The court held that it cannot conduct a "mini trial" under Section 528 BNS 2023 to examine defence pleas or evidence veracity when trial proceedings have already begun, as this is the trial court's exclusive function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1356/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Roshan Sonkar's criminal miscellaneous petition as frivolous and without merit. Sonkar, accused of offences under BNS 2023 sections including criminal intimidation and voluntarily causing hurt, failed to challenge the charge sheet, cognizance order, or file a discharge petition at appropriate stages; instead, he approached the High Court after trial commenced claiming innocence. The court held that it cannot conduct a "mini trial" under Section 528 BNS 2023 to examine defence pleas or evidence veracity when trial proceedings have already begun, as this is the trial court's exclusive function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts