SOBRATI ALIAS SOBRATI ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — B.A./3817/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 331,305,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010138512026

Filing Number

B.A./8921/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3817/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 331,305,BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SOBRATI ALIAS SOBRATI ANSARI

    Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,BINAY KUMAR SAHAY,BINAY KUMAR SAHAY, ,PRIYA SAW,BINAY KUMAR SAHAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Sobrati Ansari, accused of burglary and theft under BNS sections 331/305, after he had been in custody since December 10, 2025. The court released him on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3817/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioner Sobrati Ansari, accused of burglary and theft under BNS sections 331/305, after he had been in custody since December 10, 2025. The court released him on a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, provide contact details, and refrain from witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case