JAYKANT PD. RAI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — Cr.M.P./1374/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498-A,IPC,3/4,DP,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010138462026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./8917/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1374/2026

Registration Date

05-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 498-A,IPC,3/4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAYKANT PD. RAI

    Adv. PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU,DEEPAK SAHU, ,DEEPAK SAHU

  2. 2.PUNAM DEVI

  3. 3.SHIVESH KUMAR RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.BHARTI KUMARI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1374/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Jaykant Pd. Rai and others against The State of Jharkhand. Notice was issued to Opposite Party No. 2, with petitioners directed to file service requisites within six weeks via speed post and court process, or face automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be relisted upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1374/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1374/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Jaykant Pd. Rai and others against The State of Jharkhand. Notice was issued to Opposite Party No. 2, with petitioners directed to file service requisites within six weeks via speed post and court process, or face automatic dismissal. The rule is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be relisted upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case