JITESH KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANISH KUMAR — W.P.(Cr.)/281/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010138022026
Filing Number
W.P.(Cr.)/8898/2026
Filing Date
23-Apr-2026
Registration No
W.P.(Cr.)/281/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
TAXATION ( 186 )
Sub-Category
State Excise Act ( 42 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JITESH KUMAR
Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH, ,ARPITA SINHA,SHAILESH KR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANISH KUMAR
-
2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE JHARKHAND
-
3.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE RANCHI
-
4.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RANCHI
-
5.OFFICER IN CHARGE SADAR P.S. RANCHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Ranchi within two weeks, detailing his grievance regarding false implication in a criminal case. The court found that the SSP, being the first-instance authority, was better positioned to address the petitioner's complaint, and directed the SSP to expeditiously dispose of the representation within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. W.P.(Cr.)/281/2026
The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to file a representation before the Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP), Ranchi within two weeks, detailing his grievance regarding false implication in a criminal case. The court found that the SSP, being the first-instance authority, was better positioned to address the petitioner's complaint, and directed the SSP to expeditiously dispose of the representation within four weeks of receipt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts