PREM KUMAR @ PREM KUMAR RAM vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI — B.A./5459/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2)(b),111(3),317(5),25(1-A),25(6),25(1-B)a,26,31,35,ARMS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010137752026

Filing Number

B.A./8887/2026

Filing Date

23-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./5459/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2)(b),111(3),317(5),25(1-A),25(6),25(1-B)a,26,31,35,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PREM KUMAR @ PREM KUMAR RAM

    Adv. RISHU RANJAN,SHRESTH GAUTAM,SHRESTH GAUTAM, ,ABHISHEK SINGH,CHIRANJEEV BHADORIA,SHRESTH GAUTAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ABHAY KR TIWARI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the bail application (B.A. No. 5459/2026) of Prem Kumar, ordering him to file a supplementary affidavit with updated order-sheets of all cases within two weeks. The case was listed for hearing after filing the affidavit, with a warning that failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./5459/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the bail application (B.A. No. 5459/2026) of Prem Kumar, ordering him to file a supplementary affidavit with updated order-sheets of all cases within two weeks. The case was listed for hearing after filing the affidavit, with a warning that failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal without further consideration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case