RANJEET KUMAR ALIAS RANJEET KUMAR YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — B.A./3818/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010137112026

Filing Number

B.A./8836/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3818/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18,NDPS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANJEET KUMAR ALIAS RANJEET KUMAR YADAV

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR CHOUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 3818/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ranjeet Kumar Yadav in an NDPS Act Section 18 case after he had remained in custody for 21 months. The court considered that seizure list witness testimony indicated the seized substance was below commercial quantity and that three previous bail rejections, combined with prolonged custody, warranted release. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to submission of Aadhaar details and maintaining an active mobile number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3818/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 3818/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ranjeet Kumar Yadav in an NDPS Act Section 18 case after he had remained in custody for 21 months. The court considered that seizure list witness testimony indicated the seized substance was below commercial quantity and that three previous bail rejections, combined with prolonged custody, warranted release. Bail was set at Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, subject to submission of Aadhaar details and maintaining an active mobile number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case