PRITAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ALIAS MEGHA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN — B.A./3779/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 307,506,504,34,IPC,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010137092026
Filing Number
B.A./8834/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3779/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRITAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY ALIAS MEGHA
Adv. DEEPAK SAHU,PRATIUSH LALA,PRATIUSH LALA, ,PRATIUSH LALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAKESH RANJAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3779/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Pritam Kumar Choudhary, accused of attempted murder and arms violations in connection with firing and property damage at an informant's house. The court ordered release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, noting he was implicated based solely on a co-accused's confession and was not named in the FIR, with conditions requiring cooperation in trial and provision of contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3779/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3779/2026 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Pritam Kumar Choudhary, accused of attempted murder and arms violations in connection with firing and property damage at an informant's house. The court ordered release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, noting he was implicated based solely on a co-accused's confession and was not named in the FIR, with conditions requiring cooperation in trial and provision of contact details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts