DASHRATH SAW vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — A.B.A./3107/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(C),IF,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010136942026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8824/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./3107/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FOREST ( 137 )

Sub-Category

Indian Forest Act ,1927 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 33(1)(C),IF,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DASHRATH SAW

    Adv. MANISH YADAV

  2. 2.PINRU KUMAR GUPTA ALIAS LADU SAW ALIAS PINTU SAW

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 3107/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Dashrath Saw and Pintu Kumar Gupta, who faced arrest in a Forest Act case (Complaint Case No. 104/2021) alleging illegal poppy cultivation. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that since the land belonged to the Forest Department (not the petitioners), they had no criminal antecedents, and a co-accused had already received anticipatory bail, grounds for bail were satisfied. The petitioners were directed to surrender within three weeks and release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 13-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./3107/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 3107/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Dashrath Saw and Pintu Kumar Gupta, who faced arrest in a Forest Act case (Complaint Case No. 104/2021) alleging illegal poppy cultivation. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that since the land belonged to the Forest Department (not the petitioners), they had no criminal antecedents, and a co-accused had already received anticipatory bail, grounds for bail were satisfied. The petitioners were directed to surrender within three weeks and release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond each with two sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case