ARBIND KUMAR SAW ALIAS LADDU SAW vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK — B.A./3855/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(4),317(5),112,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010136492026

Filing Number

B.A./8795/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3855/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 317(4),317(5),112,3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARBIND KUMAR SAW ALIAS LADDU SAW

    Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,NISHAD KHAN,NISHAD KHAN, ,PRIYA SAW,VISHWAJEET KUMAR TIWARI,JUHI KUMARI,NISHAD KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - AJAY KR PATHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Arbind Kumar Saw (age 19), accused in an organized motorcycle theft case involving recovery of five stolen motorcycles. The Court denied bail considering the serious nature of charges under BNS 2023, the petitioner's criminal antecedents, risks of absconding and evidence tampering, and because a prior bail petition had already been rejected on merit in February 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3855/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court rejected the bail application of Arbind Kumar Saw (age 19), accused in an organized motorcycle theft case involving recovery of five stolen motorcycles. The Court denied bail considering the serious nature of charges under BNS 2023, the petitioner's criminal antecedents, risks of absconding and evidence tampering, and because a prior bail petition had already been rejected on merit in February 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case