ASHUTOSH RANA @ DIRAJ @ NIRAJ vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH — B.A./3956/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),352,351(2),3(5),BNS,25(1-B)(a),26,35,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010135782026
Filing Number
B.A./8758/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3956/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHUTOSH RANA @ DIRAJ @ NIRAJ
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR,AJAY KUMAR JHA,AJAY KUMAR JHA, ,SHUBHAM KUMAR,AJAY KUMAR JHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - GAUTAM RAKESH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ashutosh Rana, accused of illegal possession of a country-made pistol with live cartridges under BNS 2023 and the Arms Act. The court considered his clean criminal record and custody duration since March 19, 2026, and released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact information, and not harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3956/2026
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Ashutosh Rana, accused of illegal possession of a country-made pistol with live cartridges under BNS 2023 and the Arms Act. The court considered his clean criminal record and custody duration since March 19, 2026, and released him on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, imposing conditions that he cooperate with trial, maintain contact information, and not harass witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts