SABRAM MURMU @ SHOBHRAN MURMU vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND — B.A./3765/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010135632026

Filing Number

B.A./8752/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3765/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SABRAM MURMU @ SHOBHRAN MURMU

    Adv. REKHANKA DEVI,NARESH PD THAKUR,NARESH PD THAKUR, ,SATISH KUMAR,NARESH PD THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sabram Murmu, accused of dacoity under Section 310(2) BNS 2023 for allegedly looting a mobile phone and cable wire. The court directed his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, considering his prolonged custody since January 17, 2026, despite not being named in the original FIR. Conditions included cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card copy, maintaining contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3765/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Sabram Murmu, accused of dacoity under Section 310(2) BNS 2023 for allegedly looting a mobile phone and cable wire. The court directed his release on a Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, considering his prolonged custody since January 17, 2026, despite not being named in the original FIR. Conditions included cooperation with trial, furnishing mobile number and Aadhar Card copy, maintaining contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case