GHURAN @ RAMAWTAR PANDEY @ DHURAN vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY — B.A./3949/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 118(1),109(1),111(4),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010135572026
Filing Number
B.A./8746/2026
Filing Date
22-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3949/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GHURAN @ RAMAWTAR PANDEY @ DHURAN
Adv. ASHOK KUMAR SINGH, ,NISHA SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. No. 3949/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Ghuran @ Ramawtar Pandey, accused of attempted murder under BNS Sections 118(1), 109(1), 111(4), 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal history, lengthy custody since October 2025, and disputed allegations, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on cooperation with trial, furnishing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
04-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3949/2026
Case Summary: B.A. No. 3949/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to petitioner Ghuran @ Ramawtar Pandey, accused of attempted murder under BNS Sections 118(1), 109(1), 111(4), 3(5) and Arms Act Section 27. The court found that the petitioner had no criminal history, lengthy custody since October 2025, and disputed allegations, justifying bail despite prosecution opposition. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on cooperation with trial, furnishing contact details, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts