VISNHU SAH @ ARYAN KUMAR @ VISHNU vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA — B.A./3754/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 305,331(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010135062026

Filing Number

B.A./8719/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3754/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 305,331(4),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VISNHU SAH @ ARYAN KUMAR @ VISHNU

    Adv. ANUP KR.AGARWAL,KAPIL ANSUL,KAPIL ANSUL, ,KAPIL ANSUL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHASHI KUMAR VERMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 22-year-old Vishnu Sah, accused of jewelry theft under BNS Sections 305 and 331(4) in Mahagama P.S. case no. 33/2026. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments of no criminal antecedents, prolonged custody since February 28, 2026, willingness to cooperate with trial, and that a co-accused with similar charges was already admitted to bail. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on furnishing mobile number and Aadhaar Card with an undertaking not to change the number during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3754/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 22-year-old Vishnu Sah, accused of jewelry theft under BNS Sections 305 and 331(4) in Mahagama P.S. case no. 33/2026. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments of no criminal antecedents, prolonged custody since February 28, 2026, willingness to cooperate with trial, and that a co-accused with similar charges was already admitted to bail. Bail was set at Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount, conditional on furnishing mobile number and Aadhaar Card with an undertaking not to change the number during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case