FULCHAND HANSDA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — B.A./3869/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010134892026
Filing Number
B.A./8706/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3869/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 483 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FULCHAND HANSDA
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to Fulchand Hansda, accused in a dacoity case involving theft of copper coil from a transformer, on the grounds that he was not named in the FIR, lacks criminal antecedents, and has been in custody since December 2025. The court directed release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, providing mobile number and Aadhar card, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3869/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to Fulchand Hansda, accused in a dacoity case involving theft of copper coil from a transformer, on the grounds that he was not named in the FIR, lacks criminal antecedents, and has been in custody since December 2025. The court directed release on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties of equal amount, subject to conditions including cooperation with trial, providing mobile number and Aadhar card, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts