SUNIL GANJHU ALIAS MISIR GANJHU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN — A.B.A./2314/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 15(c),18(b),22,25,29,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010134752026
Filing Number
A.B.A./8700/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
A.B.A./2314/2026
Registration Date
27-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL GANJHU ALIAS MISIR GANJHU
Adv. NANDAN PRASAD
-
2.NANDLAL GANJHU
-
3.RAKESH GANJHU ALIAS RAKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NEHALA SHARMIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Sunil, Nandlal, and Rakesh Ganjhu) facing NDPS Act charges for alleged poppy cultivation on forest department land. The court found the allegations credible but granted bail based on the petitioners' clean criminal records and the fact that the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not them. Each petitioner was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. A.B.A./2314/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners (Sunil, Nandlal, and Rakesh Ganjhu) facing NDPS Act charges for alleged poppy cultivation on forest department land. The court found the allegations credible but granted bail based on the petitioners' clean criminal records and the fact that the disputed land belonged to the forest department, not them. Each petitioner was directed to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts