SHOYAB ANSARI ALLIAS SOIB vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — B.A./3828/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(4),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010134062026

Filing Number

B.A./8660/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3828/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 309(4),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHOYAB ANSARI ALLIAS SOIB

    Adv. PRAN PRANAY, ,KEHKASHAN AFSHEEN,RAJ NARAYAN DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Shoyab Ansari, accused of robbery under BNS 2023 Section 309(4) in Karmatanr P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, had not been subjected to T.I. Parade despite custody since February 27, 2026, and that a co-accused with similar charges had already been granted bail. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and providing mobile number and Aadhar Card to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3828/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Shoyab Ansari, accused of robbery under BNS 2023 Section 309(4) in Karmatanr P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025. The court found merit in the petitioner's arguments that he was not named in the FIR, had not been subjected to T.I. Parade despite custody since February 27, 2026, and that a co-accused with similar charges had already been granted bail. The petitioner was released on Rs. 25,000 bail bond with two sureties, conditioned on cooperation with trial, non-interference with witnesses, and providing mobile number and Aadhar Card to the lower court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case