KAMAL GIRI vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — A.B.A./2284/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 467,468,.471,341,323,448,379,354,504,506,34,IPO. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133992026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8656/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2284/2026

Registration Date

25-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 467,468,.471,341,323,448,379,354,504,506,34,IPO

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL GIRI

    Adv. JAY SHANKAR TIWARY,AVISHEK CHANDRA,AVISHEK CHANDRA, ,AVISHEK CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. /2284/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Kamal Giri's anticipatory bail petition. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that Giri allegedly sold forged land documents to the informant and, upon demand for money, entered the informant's house, threatened him, and abused him with filthy language. Given Giri's criminal antecedents and the serious nature of the allegations, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2284/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. /2284/2026 Decision: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Kamal Giri's anticipatory bail petition. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi found that Giri allegedly sold forged land documents to the informant and, upon demand for money, entered the informant's house, threatened him, and abused him with filthy language. Given Giri's criminal antecedents and the serious nature of the allegations, the court declined to grant anticipatory bail protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case