RAKESH KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA — B.A./3702/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),61(1),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010133742026
Filing Number
B.A./8637/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
B.A./3702/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )
Sub-Category
Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Bail
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAKESH KUMAR
Adv. S K VISHWAKARMA,ABHAY KUMAR,ABHAY KUMAR, ,ABHAY KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANAT KUMAR JHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Rakesh Kumar, accused in a murder case involving alleged land grabbing conspiracy. The court found that Kumar's involvement relied primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement attributing conspiracy role but no direct murder allegation, coupled with the co-accused's prior bail grant. Kumar was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, on conditions including trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3702/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Rakesh Kumar, accused in a murder case involving alleged land grabbing conspiracy. The court found that Kumar's involvement relied primarily on a co-accused's confessional statement attributing conspiracy role but no direct murder allegation, coupled with the co-accused's prior bail grant. Kumar was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties, on conditions including trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts