RINA MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — A.B.A./2312/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 323,406,420,120B,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133652026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8630/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2312/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 323,406,420,120B,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RINA MURMU

    Adv. ARUN KUMAR,JITENDRA TRIPATHI,JITENDRA TRIPATHI, ,INDRA BHUSHAN PRASAD SINHA,JITENDRA TRIPATHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Rina Murmu, Mukhiya of Raneshwar Panchayat, in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs. 1,20,000 under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. The court found that the funds were paid to Dhiren Pal (the rightful beneficiary as confirmed in panchayat proceedings), not to the petitioner, and that she had no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2312/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to Rina Murmu, Mukhiya of Raneshwar Panchayat, in a case involving alleged misappropriation of Rs. 1,20,000 under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana. The court found that the funds were paid to Dhiren Pal (the rightful beneficiary as confirmed in panchayat proceedings), not to the petitioner, and that she had no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on furnishing Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case