VIKAS KUMAR ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR SAW vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI — B.A./3819/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),111(4),111(6),317(2),3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133612026

Filing Number

B.A./8626/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3819/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 111(2),111(4),111(6),317(2),3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KUMAR ALIAS VIKASH KUMAR SAW

    Adv. RAJ SHEKHAR JHA,AKASH KUMAR TIWARI,AKASH KUMAR TIWARI, ,JIMMY KUMAR,AKASH KUMAR TIWARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Vikas Kumar, accused in a vehicle theft case, after he had been in custody since February 2026. The court accepted the petitioner's argument that he was an innocent passenger who took a lift in the stolen Scorpio vehicle without knowledge of its status, and noted a co-accused with similar charges had already been granted bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including trial cooperation and mobile number disclosure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3819/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Vikas Kumar, accused in a vehicle theft case, after he had been in custody since February 2026. The court accepted the petitioner's argument that he was an innocent passenger who took a lift in the stolen Scorpio vehicle without knowledge of its status, and noted a co-accused with similar charges had already been granted bail. Bail was granted on Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including trial cooperation and mobile number disclosure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case