SHARWAN YADAV @ SHRWAN KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — A.B.A./2315/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 190,191(2),132,121(i),324(3),351(2),352,bns. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133492026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8614/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2315/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 190,191(2),132,121(i),324(3),351(2),352,bns

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARWAN YADAV @ SHRWAN KUMAR

    Adv. PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU,DEEPAK SAHU, ,DEEPAK SAHU

  2. 2.MUKESH YADAV @ MUKESH KUMAR YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sharwan Yadav and Mukesh Yadav, who faced arrest in connection with a land measurement obstruction case. The court found the allegations questionable since the related writ petition involved a different petitioner, noted the petitioners had no criminal history, and directed them to surrender within three weeks and furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2315/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to petitioners Sharwan Yadav and Mukesh Yadav, who faced arrest in connection with a land measurement obstruction case. The court found the allegations questionable since the related writ petition involved a different petitioner, noted the petitioners had no criminal history, and directed them to surrender within three weeks and furnish bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 each with sureties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case