ROHIT MAHTO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY — B.A./3648/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 15(c),22,25,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133452026

Filing Number

B.A./8611/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3648/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )

Sub-Category

Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 15(c),22,25,NDPS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT MAHTO

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR CHOUHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: B.A. No. 3648/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rohit Mahto, a 23-year-old accused in an NDPS drug case, after he had been in custody for approximately two years. The court approved his bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, noting that the prolonged custody period warranted his release despite three prior bail rejections and state opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3648/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: B.A. No. 3648/2026 The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to Rohit Mahto, a 23-year-old accused in an NDPS drug case, after he had been in custody for approximately two years. The court approved his bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, noting that the prolonged custody period warranted his release despite three prior bail rejections and state opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case