SHANKAR LOHRA ALIAS KADE vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO — B.A./3674/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133412026

Filing Number

B.A./8607/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3674/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANKAR LOHRA ALIAS KADE

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GANJHU,PRIYANKA KUMARI,PRIYANKA KUMARI, ,RANDHIR KUMAR SHARMA,PRIYANKA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Shankar Lohra's bail petition in a murder case (IPC sections 302/201/34) involving two deaths. The court found that Lohra acted in bad faith by deliberately suppressing witness depositions from the trial and posed risks of absconding and tampering with evidence, despite his over three-year custody since January 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3674/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Shankar Lohra's bail petition in a murder case (IPC sections 302/201/34) involving two deaths. The court found that Lohra acted in bad faith by deliberately suppressing witness depositions from the trial and posed risks of absconding and tampering with evidence, despite his over three-year custody since January 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case