LAW CHOUDHARY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH — Cr.M.P./1267/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010133272026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./8595/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1267/2026

Registration Date

25-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Extension Of Time ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAW CHOUDHARY

    Adv. PRASHANT KUMAR RAI,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH, ,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHWETA SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand modified an anticipatory bail order dated 06.04.2026, extending Law Choudhary's surrender deadline by two weeks from 08.05.2026. The court found sufficient grounds to grant the extension due to a family demise that prevented timely surrender, despite the State's objection that anticipatory bail had already been granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 01-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand modified an anticipatory bail order dated 06.04.2026, extending Law Choudhary's surrender deadline by two weeks from 08.05.2026. The court found sufficient grounds to grant the extension due to a family demise that prevented timely surrender, despite the State's objection that anticipatory bail had already been granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case