MD. GUFRAN ANSARI ALIAS MD. GUFRAN ALIAS MD. ARMAN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND — B.A./3822/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 395,IPC. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010132922026

Filing Number

B.A./8562/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3822/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 395,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. GUFRAN ANSARI ALIAS MD. GUFRAN ALIAS MD. ARMAN

    Adv. RAJNI SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The bail application of Md. Gufran Ansari was adjourned by the High Court of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel stated the petitioner was previously on bail and committed to file a supplementary affidavit with certified copies documenting when he was released and subsequently re-arrested. The court directed relisting after the affidavit's submission, with a warning that failure to file within two weeks would result in automatic dismissal of the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3822/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The bail application of Md. Gufran Ansari was adjourned by the High Court of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel stated the petitioner was previously on bail and committed to file a supplementary affidavit with certified copies documenting when he was released and subsequently re-arrested. The court directed relisting after the affidavit's submission, with a warning that failure to file within two weeks would result in automatic dismissal of the bail application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case