DEEPAK VERMA ALIAS DEEPAK KUMAR VERMA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA — B.A./3654/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),3(5),61(2),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010132792026

Filing Number

B.A./8551/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3654/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(I),3(5),61(2),3(5),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK VERMA ALIAS DEEPAK KUMAR VERMA

    Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH,SHAILESH KR SINGH, ,PRAKHAR KUMAR VISHAIN,ARPITA SINHA,SHAILESH KR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SURAJ DEO MUNDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: Deepak Verma's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS sections 103(1)/61(2)/3(5) and Arms Act section 27 was rejected. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary held that framing of charges alone does not constitute fresh grounds to reconsider a previously rejected bail plea, and that the serious nature of allegations combined with risks of absconding and evidence tampering warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3654/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Deepak Verma's bail petition in a case involving charges under BNS sections 103(1)/61(2)/3(5) and Arms Act section 27 was rejected. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary held that framing of charges alone does not constitute fresh grounds to reconsider a previously rejected bail plea, and that the serious nature of allegations combined with risks of absconding and evidence tampering warranted continued detention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case