MITHUN SHEIKH @ MITHUN SK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO — B.A./3873/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 394,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010132552026

Filing Number

B.A./8532/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3873/2026

Registration Date

04-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 394,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MITHUN SHEIKH @ MITHUN SK

    Adv. MD.YASIR ARAFAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUDHIR KUMAR MAHTO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to Mithun Sheikh, accused of robbery under IPC Section 394, after he had been in custody since November 2025. The court accepted the petitioner's arguments that he was not named in the original FIR, was added without proper identification procedures, and no witnesses had been examined despite charges being framed. He was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions of trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3873/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to Mithun Sheikh, accused of robbery under IPC Section 394, after he had been in custody since November 2025. The court accepted the petitioner's arguments that he was not named in the original FIR, was added without proper identification procedures, and no witnesses had been examined despite charges being framed. He was released on Rs. 25,000 bail with two sureties of equal amount, on conditions of trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case