MD. MUMTAJ @ MD. MUMTAZ vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA — B.A./3801/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 147,148,149,341,342,353,332,333,307,IPC,3,PTDTPP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010132492026

Filing Number

B.A./8527/2026

Filing Date

20-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3801/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

PROPERTY ( 159 )

Sub-Category

Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 147,148,149,341,342,353,332,333,307,IPC,3,PTDTPP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MD. MUMTAJ @ MD. MUMTAZ

    Adv. SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KR MISHRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected bail for Md. Mumtaj in a case involving serious charges of unlawful assembly, attempted murder of police personnel, and causing injury during a 2020 law and order incident. The court cited the petitioner's five-year absconding period, risk of re-absconding, threat to public order, and potential evidence tampering as grounds for denial, despite a co-accused being previously granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3801/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand rejected bail for Md. Mumtaj in a case involving serious charges of unlawful assembly, attempted murder of police personnel, and causing injury during a 2020 law and order incident. The court cited the petitioner's five-year absconding period, risk of re-absconding, threat to public order, and potential evidence tampering as grounds for denial, despite a co-accused being previously granted bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case