ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3362/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010132392026
Filing Number
WPC/4718/2026
Filing Date
20-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/3362/2026
Registration Date
04-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
RENT RECEIPT ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
Adv. SIDHARTH SUDHANSHU,LUKESH KUMAR,LUKESH KUMAR, ,PRADEEP KUMAR,MD. FAIYAJ ALAM,LUKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHANBAD
-
3.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, DHANBAD
-
4.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, DHANBAD
-
5.THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, DHANBAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3362/2026 Court's Decision: The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Dhanbad within four weeks. The Circle Officer must then consider the petitioner's claim for online land entry and issuance of online rent receipt within eight weeks, and communicate a reasoned order either approving appropriate action or rejecting the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
20-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3362/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3362/2026 Court's Decision: The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Dhanbad within four weeks. The Circle Officer must then consider the petitioner's claim for online land entry and issuance of online rent receipt within eight weeks, and communicate a reasoned order either approving appropriate action or rejecting the claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts