CONTINENTAL PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS PARTNER BAIDHNATH SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR — WPC/3426/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010131342026
Filing Number
WPC/4650/2026
Filing Date
18-Apr-2026
Registration No
WPC/3426/2026
Registration Date
05-May-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE , TENANCY & NAZUL ( 146 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CONTINENTAL PRODUCTS THROUGH ITS PARTNER BAIDHNATH SINGH
Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR JHA,MAHAVIR PD SINHA,MAHAVIR PD SINHA, ,MAHAVIR PD SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHANBAD
-
4.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR,DHANBAD
-
5.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NIRSA BLOCK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC/3426/2026 The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition challenging discrepancies between offline and online government revenue records for land in Nirsa Block, Dhanbad. Rather than granting the mandamus relief sought, the court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Nirsa, who was instructed to consider the grievance and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
18-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3426/2026
Case Summary: WPC/3426/2026 The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition challenging discrepancies between offline and online government revenue records for land in Nirsa Block, Dhanbad. Rather than granting the mandamus relief sought, the court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Circle Officer, Nirsa, who was instructed to consider the grievance and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts