RAJ KUMAR BAISHNO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — B.A./3713/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,331(4),351(3),117(2),308(4),BNS. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010130922026

Filing Number

B.A./8471/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3713/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 310(2),311,331(4),351(3),117(2),308(4),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ KUMAR BAISHNO

    Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY, ,MD. IMRAN BEIG,MANJEET KUMAR CHAUDHARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Summary: In B.A. 3713/2026, Raj Kumar Baishno's bail application was not decided on merits. The court noted that a previous bail prayer was rejected on 18.03.2026 by Justice Deepak Roshan in B.A. No. 2135/2026. Following precedent, the court directed the Registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice for listing before the appropriate bench, as successive bail applications must return to the original bench regardless of roster changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3713/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In B.A. 3713/2026, Raj Kumar Baishno's bail application was not decided on merits. The court noted that a previous bail prayer was rejected on 18.03.2026 by Justice Deepak Roshan in B.A. No. 2135/2026. Following precedent, the court directed the Registry to place the matter before the Chief Justice for listing before the appropriate bench, as successive bail applications must return to the original bench regardless of roster changes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case