XXX vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY — A.B.A./3096/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),96,3(5),BNS. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010130832026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8465/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./3096/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 482 ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 137(2),96,3(5),BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.XXX

    Adv. NITU SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ARUP KR DEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (aunt of the victim girl) in a case involving allegations under Sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, related to facilitating the marriage of the victim girl. The court found that since the main accused (Chandan Saha) and other co-accused had already been granted anticipatory/regular bail, the petitioner's grant of bail was justified, particularly given her clean criminal record and the attending circumstances. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 05-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./3096/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner (aunt of the victim girl) in a case involving allegations under Sections 137(2), 96, and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, related to facilitating the marriage of the victim girl. The court found that since the main accused (Chandan Saha) and other co-accused had already been granted anticipatory/regular bail, the petitioner's grant of bail was justified, particularly given her clean criminal record and the attending circumstances. The petitioner was directed to surrender within two weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case