WAJID ANSARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY, ,MD TUFAIL ANSARI,SUNIL KUMAR UPADHYAY — A.B.A./2276/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),109,85,303(2),352,351(2),3(5),BNS,3/4,DP,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010130812026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8463/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2276/2026

Registration Date

25-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )

Sub-Category

Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 126(2),127(2),115(2),109,85,303(2),352,351(2),3(5),BNS,3/4,DP,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.WAJID ANSARI

    Adv. MD SHAMIM AKHTAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JITENDRA PANDEY, ,MD TUFAIL ANSARI,SUNIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Wajid Ansari's petition as withdrawn, allowing him to file a regular bail petition before the lower court instead. The State and informant did not object to the withdrawal, and the court clarified that any future bail petition would be decided on merits without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2276/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Wajid Ansari's petition as withdrawn, allowing him to file a regular bail petition before the lower court instead. The State and informant did not object to the withdrawal, and the court clarified that any future bail petition would be decided on merits without prejudice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case