MUNESHWAR KUMAR RAVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO — B.A./3710/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a)BNS. Disposed: Contested--Bail on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010130332026

Filing Number

B.A./8416/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3710/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Bail

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),238(a)BNS

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNESHWAR KUMAR RAVI

    Adv. AYUSH KUMAR,VIKASH KUMAR,VIKASH KUMAR, ,VIKASH KUMAR

  2. 2.SATYENDRA KUMAR RAVIDAS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ANUP PAWAN TOPNO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioners Muneshwar Kumar Ravi and Satyendra Kumar Ravidas, accused of murder and evidence tampering under BNS sections 103(1)/238(a). The court found that despite serious allegations, the petitioners were not named in the FIR, possessed no criminal history, had already served substantial custody, and similarly-situated co-accused were previously granted bail. They were released on Rs. 25,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, conditioned on trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3710/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to petitioners Muneshwar Kumar Ravi and Satyendra Kumar Ravidas, accused of murder and evidence tampering under BNS sections 103(1)/238(a). The court found that despite serious allegations, the petitioners were not named in the FIR, possessed no criminal history, had already served substantial custody, and similarly-situated co-accused were previously granted bail. They were released on Rs. 25,000 bail bonds each with two sureties, conditioned on trial cooperation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case