NANU KARMKAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD — B.A./3809/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 96,65(1),64(2)(m),BNS,6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010130272026

Filing Number

B.A./8411/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

B.A./3809/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )

Sub-Category

Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 96,65(1),64(2)(m),BNS,6,POCSO,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NANU KARMKAR

    Adv. RANJAN KUMAR SINGH,SANTOSH KUMAR,SANTOSH KUMAR, ,SANTOSH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SATISH PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Nanu Karmkar's bail petition in a POCSO case involving a 14-year-old victim who filed the FIR and made direct allegations against him. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found the victim's direct allegations sufficient grounds to deny bail, despite the petitioner claiming false implication and being in custody since November 2025. The court directed the State to promptly produce witnesses for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./3809/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand rejected Nanu Karmkar's bail petition in a POCSO case involving a 14-year-old victim who filed the FIR and made direct allegations against him. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found the victim's direct allegations sufficient grounds to deny bail, despite the petitioner claiming false implication and being in custody since November 2025. The court directed the State to promptly produce witnesses for trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case