ALOK KUMAR SARKHEL ALIAS ALOKE KUMAR SARKHEL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.M.P./1654/2026

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 138,NI,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010130122026

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./8397/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

Cr.M.P./1654/2026

Registration Date

29-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCHANTILE LAW ( 150 )

Sub-Category

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 138,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALOK KUMAR SARKHEL ALIAS ALOKE KUMAR SARKHEL

    Adv. ASHUTOSH PD.JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI

  2. 2.TULSI DAS

  3. 3.BRANCH MANAGER OF JHARKHAND RAJYA GRAMIN BANK, DAKSHINBAHAL, JAMTARA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court issued notice to opposite parties 2 and 3 in this criminal petition. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the case would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with relisting conditional upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  4. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  5. 06-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./1654/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Jharkhand High Court issued notice to opposite parties 2 and 3 in this criminal petition. The petitioner was directed to file service requisites within two weeks via speed post and court process, failing which the case would be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with relisting conditional upon receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case