SASHI TOPPO AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS Advocate - S.C.(LAND CEILING), ,MD SHAHABUDDIN — WPC/721/2008
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010129992008
Filing Number
WPC/2688/2008
Filing Date
07-Feb-2008
Registration No
WPC/721/2008
Registration Date
07-Feb-2008
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SASHI TOPPO AND ANOTHER
Adv. PRAKASH KISHORE PRASAD,SAASHADHAR DEY,SAASHADHAR DEY, ,SAASHADHAR DEY,SAASHADHAR DEY,SAASHADHAR DEY,MUKESH KUMAR,MUKESH KUMAR,MUKESH KUMAR,MUKESH KUMAR,SAASHADHAR DEY
-
2.Binod Toppo
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND And ORS Advocate - S.C.(LAND CEILING), ,MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
2.The Deputy Commissioner Ranchi
Adv. MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
3.The Land Reforms Deputy Collector Ranchi
Adv. MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
4.The Circle Officer Town Anchal Ranchi
Adv. MD SHAHABUDDIN
-
5.Stanishlas Toppo
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed writ petition WPC/721/2008 filed by Sashi Toppo and Binod Toppo against the State of Jharkhand and land officials regarding a property matter. The court found that the petitioners had lost interest in the case and their counsel repeatedly sought adjournments without meaningful progress over 18 years, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
10-May-2019
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
04-Jan-2013
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari
-
11-Dec-2012
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2008
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/721/2008
The Jharkhand High Court dismissed writ petition WPC/721/2008 filed by Sashi Toppo and Binod Toppo against the State of Jharkhand and land officials regarding a property matter. The court found that the petitioners had lost interest in the case and their counsel repeatedly sought adjournments without meaningful progress over 18 years, warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts