RAMAN KUMAR ALIAS RAMAN PANDEY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI — A.B.A./2322/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),61(1),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010129892026

Filing Number

A.B.A./8374/2026

Filing Date

18-Apr-2026

Registration No

A.B.A./2322/2026

Registration Date

28-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

ARMS & EXPLOSIVES ( 104 )

Sub-Category

Arms Act,1959 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 103(1),61(1),BNS,27,ARMS,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMAN KUMAR ALIAS RAMAN PANDEY

    Adv. PRAMOD KR. CHOUDHARY,ANURAG KASHYAP,ANURAG KASHYAP, ,SUPRIYA DAYAL,KOMAL S.NARAYAN,BHASWAT PRAKASH,ANURAG KASHYAP

  2. 2.SUJIT KUMAR ALIAS SUJIT RAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KUMARI RASHMI

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2322/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Raman Kumar and Sujit Kumar against the State of Jharkhand. The court ordered the case diary to be called from the concerned court and the case to be re-listed after its receipt. In the interim, the State's counsel was directed to take instructions and file a counter affidavit. No substantive order on the petition's merits was passed in this interim order dated May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. A.B.A./2322/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.B.A. No. 2322/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Raman Kumar and Sujit Kumar against the State of Jharkhand. The court ordered the case diary to be called from the concerned court and the case to be re-listed after its receipt. In the interim, the State's counsel was directed to take instructions and file a counter affidavit. No substantive order on the petition's merits was passed in this interim order dated May 8, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case